Additive Manufacturing in Industry 2026: A Comprehensive Guide to Industrial 3D Printing

The landscape of global manufacturing is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by innovations that challenge traditional paradigms of design, production, and supply chain management. At the forefront of this evolution is Additive Manufacturing (AM), commonly known as industrial 3D printing. Far from its prototyping origins, AM has matured into a robust, high-precision manufacturing methodology capable of producing end-use parts across a myriad of industries. For manufacturing professionals, engineers, and industry decision-makers, understanding the nuanced capabilities, technical specifications, and strategic implications of AM is no longer optional but essential for maintaining competitive advantage and driving innovation. This guide delves into the core principles, advanced technologies, material science, critical performance metrics, and transformative applications of industrial additive manufacturing, offering a definitive perspective on its role in the manufacturing ecosystem today and looking ahead to 2026.

Foundational Principles and Classification of Additive Manufacturing

Additive Manufacturing fundamentally redefines the production process by constructing three-dimensional objects layer by layer from a digital design. This contrasts sharply with subtractive manufacturing (e.g., machining), which removes material from a larger block, or formative manufacturing (e.g., casting, forging), which shapes material. The inherent advantage of AM lies in its ability to create complex geometries, internal structures, and customized parts with minimal material waste, unlocking unprecedented design freedom.

The international standard ISO/ASTM 52900:2021, “Additive manufacturing — General principles — Fundamentals and vocabulary,” provides a standardized classification system, categorizing AM processes into seven primary types:

1. Binder Jetting (BJ): A liquid binding agent is selectively deposited to join powder materials, layer by layer. After printing, parts often require post-processing like sintering or infiltration to achieve desired mechanical properties.
2. Directed Energy Deposition (DED): Focused thermal energy (e.g., laser, electron beam, plasma arc) is used to melt materials as they are deposited. This process is often used for repairing or adding features to existing components, or for creating large structures.
3. Material Extrusion (MEX): Material is selectively dispensed through a nozzle or orifice. The most common form is Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) or Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), where thermoplastic filament is melted and extruded.
4. Material Jetting (MJ): Droplets of build material are selectively deposited and cured or solidified. Similar to a 2D inkjet printer, but in three dimensions, often using photopolymers or waxes.
5. Powder Bed Fusion (PBF): Thermal energy selectively fuses regions of a powder bed. This category includes Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) for polymers, Selective Laser Melting (SLM) for metals, and Electron Beam Melting (EBM) for metals.
6. Sheet Lamination (SHL): Sheets of material (e.g., paper, metal foil) are bonded together to form an object. Ultrasonic Additive Manufacturing (UAM) and Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM) are examples.
7. Vat Polymerization (VP): Liquid photopolymer in a vat is selectively cured by light-activated polymerization. Stereolithography (SLA) and Digital Light Processing (DLP) are prominent examples.

This standardized framework is crucial for clear communication and technical understanding across the industry, ensuring that professionals can accurately compare processes and capabilities.

Key Industrial Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Their Applications

The industrial adoption of AM is heavily reliant on the specific capabilities of various technologies to meet rigorous performance and quality demands. Here, we highlight some of the most impactful processes currently driving manufacturing innovation:

Powder Bed Fusion (PBF)

Powder Bed Fusion technologies are at the forefront of producing high-performance metal and polymer parts.

• Selective Laser Melting (SLM) / Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS): These processes use a high-power laser to selectively melt and fuse metallic powder particles, layer by layer, creating fully dense metal components. Materials include titanium alloys (Ti-6Al-4V), nickel-based superalloys (Inconel 718, Hastelloy X), stainless steels (316L, 17-4 PH), and aluminum alloys (AlSi10Mg). SLM/DMLS excel in producing complex geometries, lightweight structures, and parts with excellent mechanical properties, making them indispensable in aerospace (e.g., turbine components, brackets), medical (e.g., orthopedic implants, surgical instruments), and automotive (e.g., performance parts, heat exchangers) industries. Key metrics include relative density typically >99.5%, tensile strength often exceeding conventionally cast equivalents, and surface finish (Ra) ranging from 5-20 µm post-build, improving to <0.8 µm with post-processing.
• Electron Beam Melting (EBM): Similar to SLM but utilizing an electron beam in a vacuum environment. EBM is particularly effective for reactive metals like titanium alloys and certain cobalt-chrome alloys, offering higher build rates for some applications and reduced residual stresses due to higher build temperatures. It’s widely used for medical implants and aerospace components where specific material properties and stress relief are critical.
• Selective Laser Sintering (SLS): Primarily used for polymers, SLS employs a laser to selectively sinter (fuse without fully melting) polymer powder particles. Materials like Nylon 12, Nylon 11, and various composites yield strong, functional parts with good isotropic mechanical properties. SLS is a workhorse for functional prototyping, end-use parts in robotics, custom jigs and fixtures, and consumer goods due to its ability to produce complex assemblies without support structures and its excellent material utilization. Typical part density is 90-98%, with good elongation at break and impact resistance.

Material Extrusion (MEX) – Industrial Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)

While FFF is widely known for desktop 3D printing, industrial-grade FFF systems are robust machines capable of processing engineering-grade thermoplastics and composites. These systems utilize precise temperature control, enclosed build chambers, and often specialized nozzles to print materials like ABS, PC, ULTEM™ (PEI), PEEK, and carbon fiber-reinforced polymers. Industrial FFF is valued for its ability to produce large, durable, functional prototypes, manufacturing tools (jigs, fixtures, gauges), and even low-volume production parts. Its relatively lower operating cost and ease of material change make it versatile for diverse applications, from automotive interior components to electrical housings. Dimensional accuracy can be within ±0.15mm or ±0.2% (whichever is greater), and parts exhibit good strength-to-weight ratios.

Vat Polymerization (VP) – Stereolithography (SLA) and Digital Light Processing (DLP)

SLA and DLP technologies use a light source (laser for SLA, projector for DLP) to cure liquid photopolymer resin layer by layer. These processes are renowned for producing parts with exceptional surface finish, fine features, and high dimensional accuracy.

• SLA: Known for large-format parts and high precision. It’s a staple for master patterns for casting, detailed functional prototypes, and medical models.
• DLP: Offers faster build speeds for smaller, intricate parts due to curing entire layers simultaneously. It’s heavily used in dentistry (e.g., aligner molds, dental crowns), jewelry casting, and microfluidic devices.

Materials range from general-purpose resins to those mimicking engineering plastics (ABS, PP), flexible elastomers, or high-temperature resistant formulations. Surface finish (Ra) can be as low as 0.2-0.8 µm, and dimensional tolerances typically ±0.05mm across small features, making them ideal for aesthetic models, intricate prototypes, and custom tooling inserts.

Binder Jetting (BJ) for Metals and Ceramics

Binder Jetting is gaining significant traction for its ability to produce complex metal and ceramic parts at high volumes and lower cost compared to PBF. After printing with a binder, the “green part” undergoes de-binding and sintering in a furnace to achieve final density and mechanical properties. This process allows for a wider range of materials, including stainless steels, tool steels, and even copper. It’s particularly attractive for applications requiring complex geometries in medium to high volumes, such as automotive components, industrial machinery parts, and specialized tooling. While post-sintering shrinkage must be accounted for in design, the resulting parts can achieve densities >97% and mechanical properties comparable to MIM (Metal Injection Molding) parts.

Engineering Materials for Additive Manufacturing

The expansion of AM into industrial applications is inextricably linked to the development and qualification of advanced engineering materials. The choice of material dictates the mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties of the final part, directly impacting its suitability for specific applications.

• Metals:
  • Titanium Alloys (e.g., Ti-6Al-4V): Exceptional strength-to-weight ratio, biocompatibility, and corrosion resistance. Critical for aerospace structural components, medical implants, and high-performance automotive parts.
  • Nickel-based Superalloys (e.g., Inconel 718, Hastelloy X): Excellent high-temperature strength, creep resistance, and corrosion resistance. Essential for jet engine components, gas turbines, and specialized chemical processing equipment.
  • Stainless Steels (e.g., 316L, 17-4 PH): Good balance of strength, corrosion resistance, and ductility. Widely used for tooling, industrial equipment, and medical instruments.
  • Aluminum Alloys (e.g., AlSi10Mg): Lightweight with good thermal conductivity. Increasingly used in automotive, aerospace, and electronics for heat sinks and structural components.
  • Tool Steels (e.g., Maraging Steel, H13): High hardness and wear resistance, often used for injection molds with conformal cooling channels.
• Polymers:
  • Nylon (PA12, PA11): Versatile, good mechanical properties, chemical resistance. Used in SLS for functional prototypes, jigs, fixtures, and end-use components.
  • Polycarbonate (PC), ABS: Good impact strength and heat resistance. Common in FFF for robust prototypes and functional parts.
  • High-Performance Polymers (e.g., PEEK, ULTEM™ (PEI)): Excellent strength, stiffness, chemical resistance, and high-temperature performance. Critical for aerospace, medical, and oil & gas applications requiring extreme conditions.
  • Photopolymers: A vast array of resins for SLA/DLP offering properties ranging from flexible to rigid, transparent to opaque, and biocompatible to high-temperature resistant.
• Composites:
  • Continuous or chopped fiber reinforcement (e.g., carbon fiber, fiberglass, Kevlar) embedded in polymer matrices significantly enhances strength, stiffness, and heat deflection temperature. These materials are processed via specialized FFF or DED systems, enabling the creation of parts with unparalleled strength-to-weight ratios for aerospace, drone, and high-performance sporting goods applications.

Material selection is a complex process, often guided by application requirements, desired mechanical properties, environmental conditions, and post-processing needs. Collaboration with material scientists and AM process experts is crucial to optimize material-process combinations.

Achieving Precision and Performance: Standards and Metrics in AM

For additive manufacturing to fully integrate into industrial production, rigorous standards and quantifiable performance metrics are indispensable. These ensure repeatability, reliability, and comparability of AM parts with traditionally manufactured components.

Key Standards for Additive Manufacturing

The development of industry standards by organizations like ISO and ASTM International is vital for the widespread adoption and qualification of AM technologies.

• ISO/ASTM 52900:2021: As mentioned, defines general principles, fundamentals, and vocabulary, providing a common language for the industry.
• ISO/ASTM 52902:2019: Specifies general principles for qualification of AM machines and processes. This standard helps ensure that AM systems meet performance requirements and produce consistent, high-quality parts.
• ISO/ASTM 52907:2022: Additive manufacturing — Qualification principles for metallic materials and parts. Crucial for aerospace and medical applications where material properties are paramount.
• ASTM F3187-16: Standard Guide for Directed Energy Deposition of Metals for Aerospace Components. This standard provides specific guidance for a critical AM process in a highly regulated industry.
• ISO/ASTM 52942:2020: Additive manufacturing — Design — General principles. Provides guidelines for designing parts for AM, crucial for leveraging design freedom effectively.
• ISO/ASTM 52904:2019: Additive manufacturing — Test methods — Particulate materials for additive manufacturing. Focuses on the characterization of powders, which directly impact print quality and final part properties.

Adherence to these standards is not merely a compliance issue but a strategic imperative for manufacturers seeking to produce certified, high-performance AM components.

Critical Performance Metrics

Evaluating the performance of AM parts requires a comprehensive understanding of several key metrics:

• Dimensional Accuracy and Precision:
  • Tolerance: The permissible variation in a dimension. Industrial AM systems can achieve tolerances down to ±0.05 mm or better for critical features, with larger parts having proportionally looser tolerances (e.g., ±0.2% of dimension).
  • Repeatability: The ability of an AM process to consistently produce parts with the same dimensions over multiple builds. This is crucial for serial production.
  • Warpage/Distortion: Deviation from the intended geometry, often caused by thermal stresses during the build process. Mitigation strategies include optimized build orientation, support structures, and process parameters.
• Surface Finish (Roughness):
  • Quantified by parameters like Ra (arithmetical mean deviation) or Rz (average maximum height of the profile). As-built metal AM parts often have Ra values of 5-20 µm, requiring post-processing (e.g., machining, polishing, chemical vapor smoothing) to achieve functional or aesthetic requirements (e.g., Ra < 0.8 µm for bearing surfaces).
• Mechanical Properties:
  • Tensile Strength, Yield Strength, Elongation at Break: Measured according to standards like ASTM E8/E8M for metals. These determine a material’s resistance to deformation and fracture under tension. AM parts can often achieve or exceed the mechanical properties of cast or even wrought equivalents, particularly with optimized process parameters and post-processing (e.g., Hot Isostatic Pressing – HIP).
  • Fatigue Life: Crucial for parts subjected to cyclic loading (e.g., aerospace components). AM parts can exhibit anisotropic fatigue behavior, which must be carefully characterized and addressed through design and post-processing.
  • Hardness: Resistance to localized plastic deformation (e.g., Rockwell, Vickers, Brinell scales).
• Density and Porosity:
  • Relative Density: The ratio of the AM part’s density to the theoretical density of the material. Industrial AM aims for >99.5% relative density for critical metal parts to ensure optimal mechanical performance.
  • Porosity: The presence of voids within the material, which can significantly reduce mechanical properties. Non-destructive testing (e.g., X-ray CT scanning) is used for porosity inspection.
• Microstructure:
  • The internal grain structure and phase composition of the material, which directly influences mechanical properties. AM processes can create unique microstructures that may differ from traditional manufacturing routes, requiring careful characterization.

Integrating these metrics into a robust quality control framework, including in-situ monitoring, post-build inspection (NDT), and mechanical testing, is paramount for qualifying AM components for demanding industrial applications.

Transformative Applications Across Industries

Additive manufacturing is no longer confined to prototyping; it is actively reshaping production strategies across a diverse range of sectors.

Aerospace and Defense

The aerospace industry was an early adopter and remains a primary driver of AM innovation. The ability to produce lightweight, complex geometries with high-performance metals (e.g., Ti-6Al-4V, Inconel 718) is invaluable. Applications include:

• Lightweighting: Optimized lattice structures and topology optimization reduce weight, leading to fuel efficiency gains (e.g., GE’s LEAP engine fuel nozzles).
• Part Consolidation: Combining multiple parts into a single, complex AM component reduces assembly time, simplifies supply chains, and improves reliability.
• Custom Tooling and MRO: Rapid production of specialized jigs, fixtures, and replacement parts for maintenance, repair, and overhaul operations.
• High-Performance Components: Turbine blades, brackets, heat exchangers, and satellite components benefiting from AM’s unique capabilities.

Automotive Industry

From rapid prototyping to end-use parts, AM is accelerating product development and customization in automotive.

• Prototyping: Faster iterations of functional prototypes for design validation and testing.
• Tooling and Fixtures: Production of custom jigs, fixtures, and molds for manufacturing lines, often with conformal cooling channels for improved efficiency.
• Customization and Performance Parts: Low-volume production of bespoke interior components, personalized trim, and high-performance parts (e.g., brake calipers, suspension components) for luxury or racing vehicles.
• Electric Vehicle (EV) Components: Lightweight battery enclosures, motor components, and thermal management systems.

Medical and Dental

AM’s ability to create patient-specific devices and complex geometries with biocompatible materials has revolutionized healthcare.

• Implants: Custom orthopedic implants (e.g., hip, knee, spinal) with porous structures that promote osseointegration.
• Prosthetics and Orthotics: Lightweight, custom-fit prosthetic limbs and orthotic devices.
• Surgical Guides and Models: Patient-specific surgical guides for precise operations and anatomical models for pre-surgical planning.
• Dental: Clear aligner molds, dental crowns, bridges, and dentures produced rapidly and accurately.

Industrial Tooling and Manufacturing Aids

AM offers significant advantages for the production of manufacturing tools.

• Injection Molds: Production of mold inserts with conformal cooling channels, leading to reduced cycle times and improved part quality.
• Jigs, Fixtures, and Gauges: Rapid, cost-effective creation of custom manufacturing aids that improve efficiency and ergonomics on the factory floor.
• Spare Parts: On-demand production of obsolete or low-volume spare parts, reducing inventory costs and lead times.

Consumer Goods and Electronics

Customization and complex aesthetics drive AM adoption in these sectors.

• Personalized Products: Custom eyewear, footwear components, and jewelry.
• Electronics: Custom enclosures, heat sinks, and internal components with complex geometries.
• Small Batch Production: Cost-effective manufacturing of niche products or limited editions.

The Future Landscape: Integration and Digital Transformation by 2026

Looking ahead to 2026, additive manufacturing will be even more deeply integrated into the broader digital manufacturing ecosystem. The convergence of AM with Industry 4.0 technologies—such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), digital twins, and advanced robotics—will unlock new levels of efficiency, autonomy, and capability.

• AI and ML for Process Optimization: AI algorithms will continuously monitor AM processes in real-time, predicting and correcting defects, optimizing build parameters, and ensuring consistent quality. This will lead to higher yields and reduced material waste.
• Digital Twins: A digital twin of an AM part or an entire AM production line will enable predictive maintenance, performance simulation, and continuous improvement throughout the product lifecycle.
• Automated Post-Processing: Robotics will play an increasingly critical role in automating tasks such as support removal, surface finishing, and quality inspection, reducing manual labor and improving throughput.
• Supply Chain Resilience: Distributed manufacturing models leveraging AM will enhance supply chain resilience, allowing for localized, on-demand production and reducing reliance on distant, vulnerable supply chains.
• Sustainability: AM’s ability to reduce material waste, enable lightweight designs, and facilitate on-demand production aligns perfectly with sustainability goals, minimizing environmental impact.

The focus will shift from merely printing parts to managing entire digital workflows, from design optimization (design for additive manufacturing – DfAM) through automated production and quality assurance. This holistic approach will solidify AM’s position as a cornerstone of advanced manufacturing.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) about Industrial Additive Manufacturing

Q1: What are the primary advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional methods for industrial applications?

A1: Industrial AM offers several key advantages, including unprecedented design freedom for complex geometries and internal structures, significant weight reduction through topology optimization and lattice structures, part consolidation (reducing assembly and inventory), rapid prototyping and production of low-volume parts, reduced material waste, and enhanced supply chain flexibility for on-demand manufacturing.

Q2: How do engineers ensure the quality and reliability of AM parts for critical applications like aerospace or medical?

A2: Ensuring quality and reliability involves a multi-faceted approach. This includes adherence to industry standards (e.g., ISO/ASTM 52900 series, ASTM F3187), rigorous material characterization (e.g., powder quality, mechanical testing), in-situ process monitoring, and comprehensive post-build inspection using non-destructive testing (NDT) methods like X-ray computed tomography (CT) for internal defect detection, ultrasonic testing, and dye penetrant inspection. Post-processing like Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) is also used to improve part density and mechanical properties.

Q3: What are the main challenges currently facing wider industrial adoption of additive manufacturing?

A3: Key challenges include the relatively high capital cost of industrial AM equipment, the need for specialized design expertise (Design for Additive Manufacturing – DfAM), the complexity of post-processing steps (e.g., support removal, surface finishing, heat treatment), the limited availability of fully characterized materials for some applications, and the ongoing development of comprehensive industry standards for qualification and certification of AM parts and processes, especially for new materials and critical applications.

Q4: Can additive manufacturing be cost-effective for high-volume production?

A4: While AM excels in low-to-medium volume production, customization, and complex parts, its cost-effectiveness for very high-volume production is still evolving. For simple, high-volume parts, traditional manufacturing methods often remain more economical. However, advancements in machine speed, multi-laser systems, automated post-processing, and binder jetting technologies are progressively lowering the cost per part, making AM increasingly competitive for certain high-volume applications, especially where design complexity or customization offers significant added value.

Q5: How does additive manufacturing contribute to sustainability in manufacturing?

A5: AM contributes to sustainability in several ways. It inherently reduces material waste by building parts layer by layer, often using only the necessary material. It enables lightweight designs (e.g., through topology optimization and lattice structures) which can lead to reduced energy consumption in applications like aerospace and automotive. Furthermore, on-demand and localized production capabilities reduce the need for extensive global shipping and large inventories, minimizing carbon footprint and optimizing resource utilization.

Conclusion

Additive manufacturing stands as a cornerstone of modern industrial innovation, offering unprecedented capabilities for design, material utilization, and production flexibility. From delivering lightweight, high-performance components for aerospace to enabling patient-specific medical devices and rapid tooling solutions, AM’s impact is profound and continuously expanding. For manufacturing professionals, engineers, and decision-makers, a strategic understanding of AM technologies, their associated standards, critical performance metrics, and diverse applications is paramount. As we look towards 2026, the integration of AM with advanced digital technologies will further solidify its role, driving efficiencies, fostering resilience, and unlocking new frontiers of engineering possibilities. Embracing additive manufacturing is not just about adopting a new technology; it is about investing in a future where manufacturing is more agile, innovative, and sustainable.

“`json
{
“@context”: “https://schema.org”,
“@graph”: [
{
“@type”: “Article”,
“mainEntityOfPage”: {
“@type”: “WebPage”,
“@id”: “https://www.mitsubishimanufacturing.com/blog/additive-manufacturing-guide-2026”
},
“headline”: “Additive Manufacturing in Industry 2026: A Comprehensive Guide to Industrial 3D Printing”,
“image”: [
“https://www.mitsubishimanufacturing.com/images/am-industry-2026-hero.jpg”,
“https://www.mitsubishimanufacturing.com/images/am-technologies.jpg”,
“https://www.mitsubishimanufacturing.com/images/am-applications.jpg”
],
“datePublished”: “2024-03-20T09:00:00+08:00”,
“dateModified”: “2024-03-20T09:00:00+08:00”,
“author”: {
“@type”: “Organization”,
“name”: “Mitsubishi Manufacturing”,
“url”: “https://www.mitsubishimanufacturing.com/”
},
“publisher”: {
“@type”: “Organization”,
“name”: “Mitsubishi Manufacturing”,
“logo”: {
“@type”: “ImageObject”,
“url”: “https://www.mitsubishimanufacturing.com/logo.png”
}
},
“description”: “Explore a comprehensive guide to industrial additive manufacturing (3D printing) for manufacturing professionals and engineers. Delve into key technologies, engineering materials, performance metrics, ISO/ASTM standards, and transformative industry applications, setting the stage for 2026.”,
“articleSection”: [
“Foundational Principles and Classification of Additive Manufacturing”,
“Key Industrial Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Their Applications”,
“Engineering Materials for Additive Manufacturing”,
“Achieving Precision and Performance: Standards and Metrics in AM”,
“Transformative Applications Across Industries”,
“The Future Landscape: Integration and Digital Transformation by 2026”
],
“keywords”: “additive manufacturing, 3D printing, industrial 3D printing, manufacturing 2026, AM technologies, metal 3D printing, polymer 3D printing, ISO/ASTM standards, manufacturing processes, engineering materials, aerospace AM, automotive AM, medical AM, digital manufacturing, Industry 4.0”,
“wordCount”: “2180”
},
{
“@type”: “FAQPage”,
“mainEntity”: [
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “What are the primary advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional methods for industrial applications?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Industrial AM offers several key advantages, including unprecedented design freedom for complex geometries and internal structures, significant weight reduction through topology optimization and lattice structures, part consolidation (reducing assembly and inventory), rapid prototyping and production of low-volume parts, reduced material waste, and enhanced supply chain flexibility for on-demand manufacturing.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “How do engineers ensure the quality and reliability of AM parts for critical applications like aerospace or medical?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Ensuring quality and reliability involves a multi-faceted approach. This includes adherence to industry standards (e.g., ISO/ASTM 52900 series, ASTM F3187), rigorous material characterization (e.g., powder quality, mechanical testing), in-situ process monitoring, and comprehensive post-build inspection using non-destructive testing (NDT) methods like X-ray computed tomography (CT) for internal defect detection, ultrasonic testing, and dye penetrant inspection. Post-processing like Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) is also used to improve part density and mechanical properties.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “What are the main challenges currently facing wider industrial adoption of additive manufacturing?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Key challenges include the relatively high capital cost of industrial AM equipment, the need for specialized design expertise (Design for Additive Manufacturing – DfAM), the complexity of post-processing steps (e.g., support removal, surface finishing, heat treatment), the limited availability of fully characterized materials for some applications, and the ongoing development of comprehensive industry standards for qualification and certification of AM parts and processes, especially for new materials and critical applications.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “Can additive manufacturing be cost-effective for high-volume production?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “While AM excels